Protecting business
from tax
risks
We challenge tax assessments. We support tax audits. We overturn unlawful notices.
Tax status
Select your situation — we'll show a step-by-step action plan.
Our results in numbers
+3 bn ₸
in tax assessments overturned
+50 M ₸
in fines prevented
+500 M ₸
returned to taxpayer accounts
+50
audits closed before starting
+30
audit notices overturned
+20
account and e-invoice unblocks enforced
Pay for the result,
not for the process
The advance covers the work: preparing procedural documents, court representation, correspondence with the tax authority. The main fee — only after the result is achieved.
If the result is not achieved — you don't pay the 70%. That means we only take on cases we're confident in.
30%
ADVANCE
For the work: documents, claims, hearings
70%
SUCCESS FEE
Only after a result on the case
Our cases
49 M ₸
in assessments overturned
Audit declared unlawful — protected CIT and VAT deductions
Situation
The tax authority excluded deductions of 49 M ₸ based on criminal proceedings against the counterparty's manager, without a sentence in legal force.
Action
Art. 264 of the НК РК and Supreme Court Normative Ruling No. 9 — exclusion is permissible only with a sentence. We assembled primary documentation and confirmed reality through the State Revenue Committee (КГД).
Result
The СМАС declared the notice unlawful. CIT of 23.6 M ₸ and VAT of 13 M ₸ overturned.
60.7 M ₸
balance restored
Error in VAT taxpayer account — secured restoration of the balance
Situation
Seven erroneous adjustments in the State Revenue Committee (КГД) information system understated the positive VAT balance by 60.7 M ₸.
Action
Filed a complaint via e-Otinish and a claim in the СМАС of Astana: inaction under the rules for maintaining the taxpayer account.
Result
By court ruling the taxpayer account was brought into line and erroneous interest reversed.
48.5 M ₸
in assessments and interest overturned
Unlawful VAT write-off after reorganisation
Situation
Two years after a merger the tax authority wrote off the transferred VAT balance and assessed 37 M ₸ plus 11 M ₸ of interest against the legal successor.
Action
We proved: obligations on winding-up reporting are personal (art. 62(2) of the НК РК); art. 429 of the НК РК does not apply to an active VAT payer.
Result
The СМАС granted the claim in full. Assessments of 37.1 M ₸ and interest of 11.4 M ₸ overturned.
48 M ₸
in potential assessments prevented
Tax authority withdrew the unscheduled audit after our objections
Situation
The tax authority (ДГД) issued a preliminary decision on appointment of an unscheduled audit on mutual settlements with counterparties. Claims: VAT of 10.5 M ₸, CIT of 23.2 M ₸ and interest of over 15 M ₸. The preliminary decision was sent via WhatsApp late in the evening.
Action
We identified 4 grounds of unlawfulness: absence of the audited period (sub-clause 8) of art. 148(1) of the НК РК), unspecified subject of the audit, unmotivated conclusion on absence of origin of goods, outdated data on e-invoice (ЭСФ) blocking. Filed a formal objection with legal substantiation.
Result
The tax authority decided not to proceed with the audit. Assessments of VAT 10.5 M ₸, CIT 23.2 M ₸ and interest over 15 M ₸ — prevented without court proceedings.
Useful articles
May 29, 2026
VAT refund in Kazakhstan: step-by-step procedure and pitfalls of the procedure
May 28, 2026
Desk control notice in Kazakhstan: how to execute, respond or appeal
May 27, 2026
Preliminary decision on appointment of a tax audit: how to defend yourself?
May 27, 2026
Got a notice after a thematic audit? How to appeal it and suspend collection
Have a tax question?
Get an initial analysis of your situation. We assess prospects and suggest a strategy — before signing a contract.